Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR in review: Laptop with Mobile RTX 3070 and acceptable battery life
Points
∼100%
+87%
Average of class
Gaming
(910 – 10745, n=184, last 2 years)
Points
∼87%
+63%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Points
∼82%
+54%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Points
∼69%
+29%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
Points
∼54%
Average
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
(2863 – 3891, n=3)
Points
∼46%
-15%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Points
∼44%
-17%
Score ReadAcer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Points
∼100%
+76%
Average of class
Gaming
(389 – 3980, n=184, last 2 years)
Points
∼82%
+44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
Points
∼69%
+21%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Points
∼66%
+15%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
Points
∼57%
Average
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
(997 – 1643, n=3)
Points
∼46%
-20%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Points
∼40%
-30%
Score WriteHP Omen 16-b1090ng
Points
∼100%
+115%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
Points
∼96%
+106%
Average of class
Gaming
(338 – 5157, n=184, last 2 years)
Points
∼91%
+96%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
Points
∼70%
+51%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
Points
∼48%
+3%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
Points
∼47%
Average
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
(1287 – 1440, n=3)
Points
∼45%
-4%
Seq ReadAcer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
MB/s
∼100%
+100%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MB/s
∼97%
+93%
Average of class
Gaming
(925 – 12763, n=184, last 2 years)
MB/s
∼78%
+56%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
MB/s
∼50%
Average
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
(2502 – 2797, n=3)
MB/s
∼47%
-6%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
MB/s
∼43%
-14%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
MB/s
∼36%
-28%
Seq WriteAcer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
MB/s
∼100%
+112%
Average of class
Gaming
(308 – 11316, n=184, last 2 years)
MB/s
∼76%
+60%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MB/s
∼64%
+35%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
MB/s
∼50%
+6%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
MB/s
∼47%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
MB/s
∼44%
-7%
Average
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
(1262 – 1969, n=3)
MB/s
∼36%
-23%
4K ReadAcer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
MB/s
∼100%
+44%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MB/s
∼90%
+29%
Average of class
Gaming
(20 – 108, n=184, last 2 years)
MB/s
∼78%
+13%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
MB/s
∼70%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
MB/s
∼69%
-2%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
MB/s
∼60%
-13%
4K WriteHP Omen 16-b1090ng
MB/s
∼100%
+39%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
MB/s
∼82%
+15%
Average of class
Gaming
(18 – 364, n=184, last 2 years)
MB/s
∼77%
+7%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
MB/s
∼72%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
MB/s
∼53%
-27%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
MB/s
∼40%
-44%
4K-64 ReadAcer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
MB/s
∼100%
+72%
Average of class
Gaming
(216 – 3395, n=184, last 2 years)
MB/s
∼83%
+43%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
MB/s
∼71%
+23%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
MB/s
∼62%
+6%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
MB/s
∼58%
Average
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
(689 – 1306, n=3)
MB/s
∼45%
-23%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
MB/s
∼40%
-31%
4K-64 WriteHP Omen 16-b1090ng
MB/s
∼100%
+142%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
MB/s
∼91%
+120%
Average of class
Gaming
(243 – 4381, n=184, last 2 years)
MB/s
∼90%
+118%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
MB/s
∼72%
+75%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
MB/s
∼45%
+9%
Average
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
(1061 – 1116, n=3)
MB/s
∼42%
+1%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
MB/s
∼41%
Access Time ReadAsus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
ms *
∼100%
Average
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
(0.079 – 0.11, n=3)
ms *
∼91%
+9%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
ms *
∼87%
+13%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
ms *
∼68%
+32%
Razer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
ms *
∼55%
+45%
Average of class
Gaming
(0.02 – 0.23, n=179, last 2 years)
ms *
∼50%
+50%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
ms *
∼41%
+59%
Access Time WriteRazer Blade 15 Base Edition 2021, i7-10750H RTX 3060
ms *
∼100%
-424%
Average of class
Gaming
(0.012 – 0.425, n=184, last 2 years)
ms *
∼51%
-166%
MSI Delta 15 A5EFK
ms *
∼28%
-48%
Average
Samsung PM991a MZVLQ1T0HBLB
(0.021 – 0.038, n=3)
ms *
∼25%
-32%
Acer Nitro 5 AN515-58-72QR
ms *
∼19%
-0%
Asus TUF Dash F15 FX517ZR
ms *
∼19%
HP Omen 16-b1090ng
ms *
∼15%
+24%